Most Active Stories
- The Spiritual Edge: The key to happiness? It's in the science
- TaskRabbit takes hold in Bay Area divided by income gap
- City Visions: What's Driving Change in the Tenderloin?
- Band of volunteers keeps an eye on SF bond projects
- Gentrification versus "Jazzification": Birdland nightclub grows vision to spark jazz district
Cops & Courts
Is internet vigilantism justified when governments fail to uphold the law?
Cases of rape in Steubenville and Maryville were re-opened after online activist group Anonymous brought media attention and exposure to perpetrators. So what is the power of online dissent? And what if the laws themselves are unjust? Many online vigilantes are lashing out in response to increasing state and corporate surveillance. What tactics are acceptable? And how are governments responding to civil disobedience online? Join the conversation on the next Your Call, with Rose Aguilar, and you.
Quinn Norton, a journalist, photographer and blogger covering hacker culture, Anonymous, Occupy movement, intellectual property and copyright issues, and the Internet
Ricardo Dominguez, an associate professor in the Visual Arts department at the University of San Diego and co-founder of the hacktivist group Electronic Disturbance Theater
Hadar Aviram, professor of law at U.C. Hastings and co-chair of the Hastings Intitute for Criminal Justice. Professor Aviram’s research focuses on the criminal justice system and examines policing, courtroom practices, and broad policy decisions.
The Daily Beast - The New Vigilantes
Quinn Norton - How Antisec Died
New Republic - Is Anonymous’s Rape Vigilantism a Public Good?
The New Yorker - Hacker with a Cause